<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Second Life for Architectural Collaboration&#8230;wishful thinking perhaps.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://studiowikitecture.wordpress.com/2007/06/08/69/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://studiowikitecture.wordpress.com/2007/06/08/69/</link>
	<description>Improving Architecture and City Planning by Harnessing the Ideas behind: Web 2.0, Open Source, Mass Collaboration, Social Networking, Crowd Sourcing, Crowd Wisdom, Social Production, Open Platforms, Open Innovation, Collective Intelligence, Decentralized Collaboration, Participatory Culture and the like.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:56:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seraphine</title>
		<link>http://studiowikitecture.wordpress.com/2007/06/08/69/#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator>Seraphine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://studiowikitecture.wordpress.com/2007/06/08/69/#comment-560</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a fan of Second Life. I think it is a viable architecture, certainly, but the average user is by necessity rather tech-savvy. Unless Linden Labs succeeds in making the environment more user-friendly, companies like Google, Microsoft or Sony will ultimately provide competing (and more successful) architectures for the unwashed masses. Personally, even if Adobe et al succeed, I&#039;d rather stay in Second Life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a fan of Second Life. I think it is a viable architecture, certainly, but the average user is by necessity rather tech-savvy. Unless Linden Labs succeeds in making the environment more user-friendly, companies like Google, Microsoft or Sony will ultimately provide competing (and more successful) architectures for the unwashed masses. Personally, even if Adobe et al succeed, I&#8217;d rather stay in Second Life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Harrison</title>
		<link>http://studiowikitecture.wordpress.com/2007/06/08/69/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>David Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://studiowikitecture.wordpress.com/2007/06/08/69/#comment-548</guid>
		<description>Nice to see online Ryan. I have posted a reference along with a really concise overview of my opinions here: (http://www.stress-free.co.nz/second_life_aec_collaboration_and_ryan_schultz)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see online Ryan. I have posted a reference along with a really concise overview of my opinions here: (<a href="http://www.stress-free.co.nz/second_life_aec_collaboration_and_ryan_schultz" rel="nofollow">http://www.stress-free.co.nz/second_life_aec_collaboration_and_ryan_schultz</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vibrant SL Dialogue U decide&#8230;APLINK still believes in SL - itsReal &#171; APLINK - Asia Pacific Link</title>
		<link>http://studiowikitecture.wordpress.com/2007/06/08/69/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>Vibrant SL Dialogue U decide&#8230;APLINK still believes in SL - itsReal &#171; APLINK - Asia Pacific Link</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 14:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://studiowikitecture.wordpress.com/2007/06/08/69/#comment-538</guid>
		<description>[...] Using Second Life for Architectural Collaboration&#8230;wishful thinking perhaps.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Using Second Life for Architectural Collaboration&#8230;wishful thinking perhaps.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
